The Athiest Thread

Atheist, Agnostic, Theist


  • Total voters
    49
Status
Not open for further replies.
Regarding the "divinity" of Jesus Christ, I have a major wrench to throw into this..

Pretty much all of Jesus's "miracles", were copied from Egyptian Gods, Greek Gods, and others.

The story of his resurrection, walking on water, healing the sick etc, is directly stolen from mythology of previous "Gods" thousands of years before Jesus.

So what I am saying, is that Christ definitely existed as a human being, but the church used these stories of "miracles" to get the Pagan followers to more easily convert.

Just an interesting fact: Jesus was NOT born on Dec 25, but scholars estimate sometime in April as accurate. The reason for Dec 25? Because the winter solstice was already a Pagan holiday, so the transition from Paganism to Christianity was easier to bare. Christianity was created for political control, and to enslave the masses.

And here's a source:

 
never though I be posting in this again.....but thou is right Damn I suck. He was not born on dec 25th. Although I know what day and month he was born in Thou cannot say.
 
The Gospel of Truth, probably by Valentius


The Aprocryphon of John, probably by Saturninus


The Treatise On Resurrection, by uncertain author of the late second century


Acts of Pontius Pilate, reports sent from Pilate to Tiberius, referred to by Justin Martyr


Phlegon, born about 80 AD, as reported by Origen
WELL, WELL, WELL.


IT LOOKS LIKE YOU AREN’T EVEN CONFIDENT IN THE “EVIDENCE” YOU’RE PROVIDING ME WITH.


NOT ONLY THAT, A NICE BIG CHUNK OF IT IS BASED ON HEARSAY AND RUMOURS. VERY COMPELLING, I MUST SAY.


MOST OF THE ANCIENT NON-CHRISTIAN REFERENCES YOU MENTIONED ARE CHALLENGED WHEN ONE USES ONLY A LITTLE BIT OF SKEPTICISM.


LOOK AT WHAT MY GOOGLE SEARCHES BROUGHT UP IN RESPONSE:


http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evidence_for_the_historical_existence_of_Jesus_Christ


http://www.atheist-community.org/library/articles/read.php?id=700


WHATEVER. I JUST WANT TO LEAVE YOU WITH ONE THING.


THE REASON I EMPHASIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF A CONSENSUS, IN REGARDS TO WHAT MOST HISTORIANS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT JESUS, AND ALSO WHAT MOST SCIENTISTS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT HIM…IS BECAUSE IF THE FACTS ARE AT LEAST AGREEABLE AMONG THEM, THEN I WOULDN’T HAVE SO MUCH TROUBLE BELIEVING YOU.


BUT NO. WHAT DO WE HAVE? APOLOGISTS AND SKEPTICS WHO STILL ARGUE ABOUT THE FACTS! THESE PEOPLE CAN’T EVEN AGREE ON THE EVIDENCE TO ANY MEANINGFUL DEGREE, SO HOW THE FUCK DO YOU EXPECT ME TO TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY?


IF THIS IS WHAT IT TAKES TO CONVINCE YOU, I DON’T EVEN CARE WHAT YOU THINK. GET OUT OF MY THREAD. I AM BETTER THAN YOU.
 
@moneymuffins.

As much as I agree with you, peoples minds are already made up. Especially when they reach their 20's, people tend to be stuck in their ways and aren't open to rational debates regarding their faith. I was lucky, I was introduced to Philosophy in my teens when I was still impressionable.

What I wanna know is...

WTF are Christians doing on this thread trying to convince a handful of self-admitted atheists that their wrong? If your gonna spew off that superstitious nonsense, the least you can do is have a decent argument, oh wait... THERE ISN'T A DECENT ARGUMENT FOR RELIGION.
 
@moneymuffins.

As much as I agree with you, peoples minds are already made up. Especially when they reach their 20's, people tend to be stuck in their ways and aren't open to rational debates regarding their faith. I was lucky, I was introduced to Philosophy in my teens when I was still impressionable.

What I wanna know is...

WTF are Christians doing on this thread trying to convince a handful of self-admitted atheists that their wrong? If your gonna spew off that superstitious nonsense, the least you can do is have a decent argument, oh wait... THERE ISN'T A DECENT ARGUMENT FOR RELIGION.

why are you trying to convince a bunch of christians that THEY are wrong?

Pot calling kettle black homes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top