Man Court poll.

[REPROBEAN_CHILD]

You know about quotas in law enforcement and military right? Women can fail the physicals and still get in. Also the firefighter exam was made easier to encourage women to pass and get in. While a man can't fail the physical. That point works more against you than for you.

As for the sexual harassment example. It's in the state California law regarding universities. Do you your research if you don't believe it's there or you don't think women would use it. Since both have happened. How is this paranoia? A completely sexist bill was passed singling men out. That's evidence within itself. You are pretty much talking out of your ass rather than doing anything productive here.

That's because there are physical differences between men and women. That's nothing anyone could ignore, so there has to be compromises. I believe women actually do have the potential to be just as strong as any guy, but given the gender roles that's been forced on them since childhood, they hardly ever each that full potential. Hell, I could even argue that it's unfair that men are expected to push more effort, but the fact remains they've been taught to take in more than women.

Meaning she can verbally tell me she wants to have sex with me but her having a beer means she can charge me for rape later.

But how would you know she would do that? That's just an assumption. You can seriously think every girl will plot to use this. THAT'S why it's paranoia: you can't live life thinking about the worst possible outcome. I've search for what you're telling me, and all I see are countermeasures against rape. Here's my question to you regarding the sexual assault: who would even take the risk of getting involved with a girl who had too much to drink?

 

[Alex.J]

That's because there are physical differences between men and women. That's nothing anyone could ignore, so there has to be compromises. I believe women actually do have the potential to be just as strong as any guy, but given the gender roles that's been forced on them since childhood, they hardly ever each that full potential. Hell, I could even argue that it's unfair that men are expected to push more effort, but the fact remains they've been taught to take in more than women.



But how would you know she would do that? That's just an assumption. You can seriously think every girl will plot to use this. THAT'S why it's paranoia: you can't live life thinking about the worst possible outcome. I've search for what you're telling me, and all I see are countermeasures against rape. Here's my question to you regarding the sexual assault: who would even take the risk of getting involved with a girl who had too much to drink?

You are essentially arguing with me without little or no understanding of the topic being argued. Read this and stop being useless.


http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...cts-yes-means-yes-law-defining-sexual-consent

http://www.businessinsider.com/occidental-sexual-assault-2014-9

 

[Marginal]

That's because there are physical differences between men and women. That's nothing anyone could ignore, so there has to be compromises. I believe women actually do have the potential to be just as strong as any guy, but given the gender roles that's been forced on them since childhood, they hardly ever each that full potential.

That's physically impossible. It's not a mental issue at all.

 

[Alex.J]

That's because there are physical differences between men and women. That's nothing anyone could ignore, so there has to be compromises. I believe women actually do have the potential to be just as strong as any guy, but given the gender roles that's been forced on them since childhood, they hardly ever each that full potential. Hell, I could even argue that it's unfair that men are expected to push more effort, but the fact remains they've been taught to take in more than women.

That's physically impossible. It's not a mental issue at all.

Exactly Marginal, there are obvious genetic differences that are highly in our favor when it comes to things like fire fighting. Even when measuring athletes, men are still stronger. Men also have a bigger lung capacity. Seems important for fire fighting. http://gyazo.com/e4369531927a4bc722e9a09c5e5d15dd

 

[REPROBEAN_CHILD]

Exactly Marginal, there are obvious genetic differences that are highly in our favor when it comes to things like fire fighting. Even when measuring athletes, men are still stronger. Men also have a bigger lung capacity. Seems important for fire fighting. http://gyazo.com/e4369531927a4bc722e9a09c5e5d15dd

Alright, men are stronger. Now you know why things are different for women?

You are essentially arguing with me without little or no understanding of the topic being argued. Read this and stop being useless.


http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...cts-yes-means-yes-law-defining-sexual-consent

http://www.businessinsider.com/occidental-sexual-assault-2014-9

I know what you're talking about. I used to be into this whole "fight for men's right" thing, before I realized how bad some of it was. Nothing wrong with standing up for men's rights, but a lot of it came from men who either can't take rejection or stick date the wrong women. As some of the commenters said, the law isn't anti-male at all. It just means no means no. If a girl was really into it, she'd keep saying yes [trust me]. And honestly, this debate is just ongoing with no end in sight. Dude, I wouldn't even bother with shit like this, just because of how cynical it's going to make you. The fact you want to resort to calling people "useless" is proof enough of the narcissism and entitlement that plagues a lot of MRAs.