Man Court poll.

[Alex.J]

I know what you're talking about and my point still stands.

It just means no means no.

who would even take the risk of getting involved with a girl who had too much to drink?

You have no clue what I'm talking about. California did away with the no means no law and passed yes means yes. Drinking too much isn't the issue, ANY amount of alcohol will do. You can say this debate has no end in sight, but it hasn't even started since you have no clue what I'm talking about. You are useless since you are arguing something you don't understand. Bringing up no means no and drinking too much proves this. So yeah, you don't know what I'm talking about.

As far as narcissism and entitlement. You are trying to argue something you don't understand and say you are right. Telling you to read an article so you understand what I'm talking about isn't that narcissistic but common sense.

 

[Alex.J]

Also, as for narcissism. I guess that's why I made a poll to get everyone's opinion on something? This thread took a life of it's own when you came in here and started talking about how amazing you are. You turned this thread about yourself. That seems like textbook narcissism. Hmmmmmm

From my experience, bars aren't the best places to meet women; you can meet girls anywhere. What matters is your intention and how you do it. Also, I think people think way too much on this. Girls typically want to pay for themselves anyway.

The way you mentioned drinking first gave me the impression that you're implying a drinking establishment. I wouldn't even take dating that seriously; it's supposed to be fun. I'd rather do things on a date than just eat at a table. Also, have you guys considered that your experience came from dating the wrong women? And women do prefer a man to lead, because it's typically masculine to be a leader. So even though I prefer women to pay for themselves, I'd have no problem doing it.

 

[REPROBEAN_CHILD]

There is nothing wrong with sharing experience, as long as you don't insult or come off as condescending (which is what you did). That's what narcissism is. I never claimed to be amazing or about how much success I had. I had an opinion, so I shared it. You just didn't like it; don't put words in my mouth.

And as far as your debate goes, I'm talking about MRAs and the debates they make. I'm not just talking about the state law debate. I mentioned this group, since the comment section was full of people with that mindset. And from what I've seen, you have it, too. Since no means no wasn't passed, I don't know why you wanted to mention it in the first place. If I don't know that much about this failed law, then I it's better off that I didn't (if it wasn't passed, so I see no point). The people discussing the article are too full of negativity, since they don't get what they feel entitled to. Go ahead and do what you want to do.

 

[Marginal]

Alright, men are stronger. Now you know why things are different for women?

Mainly because testosterone promotes denser bones and greater muscle mass. This is a straight out physical fact. You suggested it was a mere issue of culture, and while that is a popular feminist notion (though badly mapped since no woman would actually make the claim that you did) it is straight up wrong.

Most of the current feminist debate centers around changing culture to lead the masses by the nose to where they want it to end up. Whether or not that's realistic is another issue entirely that the physical aspects can't address because that difference is inbuilt.

 

[Alex.J]

There is nothing wrong with sharing experience, as long as you don't insult or come off as condescending (which is what you did). That's what narcissism is. I never claimed to be amazing or about how much success I had. I had an opinion, so I shared it. You just didn't like it; don't put words in my mouth.

And as far as your debate goes, I'm talking about MRAs and the debates they make. I'm not just talking about the state law debate. I mentioned this group, since the comment section was full of people with that mindset. And from what I've seen, you have it, too. Since no means no wasn't passed, I don't know why you wanted to mention it in the first place. If I don't know that much about this failed law, then I it's better off that I didn't (if it wasn't passed, so I see no point). The people discussing the article are too full of negativity, since they don't get what they feel entitled to. Go ahead and do what you want to do.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...rnia-bill-yes-means-yes-sex-assault/14765665/

http://rt.com/usa/191572-california-sex-law-consent/

Uh, the law passed? So again, you don't know what you are talking about.

Again, I'll clearly demonstrate why you are narcissistic. Since the beginning of this thread. I have looked for "evidence" to promote all my arguments. The creation of this thread was collect evidence to support my claims. Since then, I have proven evidence about weddings and evidence about this Californian law that is unfair to men. Why do I collect evidence? I strive to be informed. Why did I post a poll on here? To reduce bias. I am also modest enough to know I don't understand everything. I look for research to help me understand the world.

Now lets look at you. You have submitted zero articles or research. Most of your "examples" have been anecdotal. Resting on the idea that you are correct no matter what. You have tons of pride. You aren't willing to see the obvious truth in front of you. Some things are opinion, but men being genetically different is a fact. Same with this law that's been passed. To argue with me about things you don't understand is the basis of narcissism.