The "What Should I Study?" Thread


I would make a recommendation to you my young friend. Consider becoming a molecular-chemical engineer. I had a friend who became one and it sounds tempting if not for the fact I am lazy. They make six figures and of all degrees they have the lowest unemployment. Fewer than one tenth of one percent of all graduates with degrees in molecular chemistry are unemployed, compared to 4% of medical degrees, 8% of law and 16% of business. (To hear him tell it at the time) I don't know if he was pulling his figures out of his ass but still, he did pick his career entirely on employ-ability. The guy got hired by an orange juice company a year before he had even graduated. They paid him 60,000 dollars to finish his last year and then start with them. Granted he'd interned for them first but you get the picture.

You could probably do worse.
 
I would make a recommendation to you my young friend. Consider becoming a molecular-chemical engineer. I had a friend who became one and it sounds tempting if not for the fact I am lazy. They make six figures and of all degrees they have the lowest unemployment. Fewer than one tenth of one percent of all graduates with degrees in molecular chemistry are unemployed, compared to 4% of medical degrees, 8% of law and 16% of business. (To hear him tell it at the time) I don't know if he was pulling his figures out of his ass but still, he did pick his career entirely on employ-ability. The guy got hired by an orange juice company a year before he had even graduated. They paid him 60,000 dollars to finish his last year and then start with them. Granted he'd interned for them first but you get the picture.

You could probably do worse.

I think molecular chemical engineering is a pretty bad choice unless you know you can finish the degree.

While we are talking about low unemployment jobs, you may want to consider actuarial science. It's main use is in the life insurance market where your job would be to value the worth of the rest of people's lives. I find it to be pretty fascinating, and the unemployment rate is pretty darn low at more or less 0 percent.

Unfortunately, you will find that many of these high demand jobs require quite a bit of math. The program probably differs depending on how much theory your school feels is suitable. Where I went, statistics was more or less an extension of analysis, but other places probably settle for just having you memorize statistics rather than construct and prove statistics.
 
Where I went, statistics was more or less an extension of analysis, but other places probably settle for just having you memorize statistics rather than construct and prove statistics.

Is that what you do iKo? That is to say did you ultimately go into that field?
 
I think it's interesting, but I don't really care for the practical application. In the end, models are models. They're used to help us understand why things are the way they are, and they help a lot to make educated predictions, but we shouldn't really consider them to represent what's really going on. Maybe that's a plea for better models, but I'll leave that to the engineers, my interest is just in the intuition.

Looking back, it's pretty interesting how far that kind of thought got me into areas I had no business. I got pretty far into math without ever really learning how to compute integrals. Since most of our classes were proof based, I just kind of pushed on because I was able to prove things about integrals and stochastic models without ever really being able to tell you what they evaluated too. Eventually I hit a brick wall though, since you just can't analyze things in a reasonable amount of time unless you're solid at computation.

My own personal recommendation is to consider how much it's going to cost you to study and adjust your goals accordingly. I had spent 4 years studying pretty much whatever I wanted, and it was pretty terrifying in the last year having a degree in economics and a minor in philosophy, and knowing that I absolutely didn't want anything to do with finance. By not focusing on practical matters, I really just left the direction of my life to chance, and given the current state of the economy...not a very good idea if you can avoid it.

On the other hand, I wasn't leaving school with a large amount of debt because I was mostly on grants. The situation you really don't want to be in is not being able to find a job, and having large amounts of student loans on top of that. The concept behind the student loan is that by borrowing money now, you are gaining the education necessary to get a job that will allow you to pay it off in the future. Sadly that is not the case, and education is deceptively subsidized. In an ideal world, education would be about making yourself a better person; I think it would be swell if everyone studied philosophy. In the real world, you need to pay bills. College does give you the opportunity to explore all sorts of cool things--once you have a job, you just don't have time to just learn. So the trick is to find that balance, get what you NEED out of your education, but try as hard as you can to fit in what you WANT.

Here's what I think about Computer Science. You probably have not had enough exposure to remotely know if this is something you want to pursue. It's more than just wanting to make games, I'm sure many of us have had some sort of dream of making a game at some point, and for most of us computer science wasn't the right path for us.

My suggestion is to start learning a serious programming language like C. If you find yourself really interested in finding out why things work the way they do, than Computer Science might be a good match for you. If you find yourself really interested in using your knowledge to do useful things, than Computer Engineering might be a better match. Naturally you're more likely to have a mixture of the two. But in either case, you have to find a real passion for it, that's the difference between having the drive to finish the program, and just thinking "it would be cool if I could make this cool video game." And honestly, there's nothing wrong with you if you aren't seriously interested in the theory of computation.
 
Back
Top