Self Defence, or Murder?

Self defence, or murder?

  • Self defence

    Votes: 13 35.1%

  • Murder

    Votes: 14 37.8%

  • Other

    Votes: 9 24.3%

  • Don't know

    Votes: 1 2.7%
  • Total voters
    37
Thank God the US has such smart weapon regulations. Neither the Kids, nor the owner of the store should have weapons at all, but thats another story.

Murder.
 
...This is not murder. Im sure the guy was not looking to just kill someone. He was frightened and had to do what was best for him, not for the others. I'm sure he shot the kid to make sure he wouldn't get up and maybe pull a gun out on him. It was in his best interest to kill the kid. How much would you like to bet that given the same situation you wouldn't have time to decide wether he was a threat or not, or if he still had a gun, or if he was unconcious or just tricking you, or if he would wake up and try something? You generally don't have time for those kind of questions, so it is best to assume the worst and protect yourself rather than your attacker. I don't care if the kid was unarmed, he robbed the guy and a gun was shown to him. Thats all. This is self defence. And, even if it was murder -_- It's not the guys fault (Well technically, but judgement wise he was lacking. Many people use this for their defense when they kill on PURPOSE or for no reason; this man had a reason).
_________________________________________
====== DOUBLE POST AUTO-MERGE ======
Oh, and boringryu, if what you say is true then I defenitely think that the law you stated is completely flawed. Not like it would be the only flawed one, but that is stupid. Sooo a man goes into your house and is breaking everything in sight. You later walk in and see the house is destroyed and a HUGE man in black is running towards you, looking as though he is about to harm you. He has no visible weapon, though. You cannot use a gun, or else it is murder? How is that fair? What if he was hiding a knife or something or even a pistol somewhere? Are you just going to say "Well, let's make this fair. I, a 140 pound man will take on you, a 240 pound man with my fists." Is that even sane? You should use whatever you deem necessary to defend yourself in a time of danger against whatever. There should be nothing that regulates how well you can protect yourself. That is downright BS...
 
docvizzo said:
Thank God the US has such smart weapon regulations. Neither the Kids, nor the owner of the store should have weapons at all, but thats another story.
Click to expand...

Is that sarcastic? I mean... are you trying to say that only the Military, state officials, etc. have guns in Germany? I find that very hard to believe. Why shouldn't the owner of the store have a gun? Look what happened? Say the criminal did decide to use his weapon... oh shit son, you just got shot in the face because you weren't prepared.

Thisin' aint no liberal overseas tea party son... THIS IS AMERICA! *in best southern accent*
 
MAILBOXARSON99 said:
How was the pharmacist supposed to know the unconscious robber wasn't going to pull any fast shit?
Click to expand...
Maybe you could tell he knew by the way he was just walking around all ho-hum while coming back in the store, getting his other gun, emptying his clip, and THEN calling the police? He knew what the fuck he was doing, IMO. He had plenty of time to think about it.
 
I dont know a SINGLE Person that has a gun. And believe me im not a brave chield. I cant even remember the last time ANY store was robbed here in Germany.
Last big issue was the killing spree of the 17 year old kid 2 months ago, killed 15 people. His hobbys: Going to the shooting club. His fathers hobby: Going to the shooting club and collecting weapons. If his father had no Berreta under his bed, those 15 people would still live. Easy as that. BTW same issue with the last killing spree a few years ago.

I dont think i will ever get shot. Nobody needs a gun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top