Felix007
[01] Neophyte
If I had $1 for every time God bailed me out..
A vast majority of the people in the United States disagree with the theory of evolution for no other reason than their pastor tells them to, or they want an extremely literal interpretation of the Bible. This leads to the "teach both sides" controversy (I say that word with disgust), despite the fact Creationism hasn't a shred of evidence in its favor. Then we have private universities teaching that evolution is a myth, passing it on to their children, etc. Evolution happens to be the unifying theory in biology, and has led to many advancements in the medical world, such as penicillin. When religious groups contradict science in such a way for no other reason than dogma, it can lead to massive repercussions when the next generation "takes over".
I don't believe his point was that you are inferior, but that religion can and has led to atrocities. The Crusades, the Inquisition, and the stoning of heretics before Newton's time are all prime examples. Contemporary actions include women's suffrage and homosexual marriage.
That sounds about right, hence my problem with the idea of moral absolutes from a deity. Some laws seem to hold no more weight than the idea that it's okay to kill people on Tuesdays, but only if they're wearing a purple hat and clown shoes. Moral relativism, or even humanism, if you can rationalize a universal standard via sentience, seems to fill the gap in a more logical fashion.
Y-disciple said:That's generalizing a bit. It all depends on how you interpret the Bible (or whatever book you choose). What I see is that God would want us to be accepting of others regardless of race, sexuality, beliefs, etc. Religion can condradict science or it can agree with it, depending on who you ask.
A vast majority of the people in the United States disagree with the theory of evolution for no other reason than their pastor tells them to, or they want an extremely literal interpretation of the Bible. This leads to the "teach both sides" controversy (I say that word with disgust), despite the fact Creationism hasn't a shred of evidence in its favor. Then we have private universities teaching that evolution is a myth, passing it on to their children, etc. Evolution happens to be the unifying theory in biology, and has led to many advancements in the medical world, such as penicillin. When religious groups contradict science in such a way for no other reason than dogma, it can lead to massive repercussions when the next generation "takes over".
Y-disciple said:Sure, I'll give you that. But what point are you specifically trying to prove? Are you trying to say that because of these atrocities, it's wrong to believe in a god? I want to make sure you're not looking upon believers as inferior to you in any way, because we're all equals, just with different beliefs.
I don't believe his point was that you are inferior, but that religion can and has led to atrocities. The Crusades, the Inquisition, and the stoning of heretics before Newton's time are all prime examples. Contemporary actions include women's suffrage and homosexual marriage.
iKitomi said:Yes, for all intents and purposes, if God existed and had a universal measure for morality, it would be arbitrary to us whether or not they are moral, though said god figure might have had some reasoning of his own for establishing such laws. You either broke the law or you didn't, which from a purely objective standard makes it prohibitively difficult to be moral with laws given by the likes of religion.
That sounds about right, hence my problem with the idea of moral absolutes from a deity. Some laws seem to hold no more weight than the idea that it's okay to kill people on Tuesdays, but only if they're wearing a purple hat and clown shoes. Moral relativism, or even humanism, if you can rationalize a universal standard via sentience, seems to fill the gap in a more logical fashion.