Casey Anthony
- Thread starter RT0wn
- Start date
Ghengis_John
[13] Hero
So you know nothing about the case but you're sure that she's innocent because you just didn't like how the media was ganging up on her?
Forgive my scoff.
*Ahem*
Scoff.
I like you warui, and I can appreciate the sentiment of feeling for someone who's getting ganged up on (she also has some nice eyes) but you're going to have to give me more than that man. I'm not trying to be confrontational when I say this but facts trump opinions (like the ad says) so find me some facts. We've got quite a damning pile of evidence against her, so what did she use to get out of this? I mean she didn't testify or subject herself to cross examination.
WARUI_NE
Prettier than you
didn't say if she was guilty or not.personally I don't care either way. I'm saying he has a hard time beliving she was found not guilty because of the way the media portrayed her
and also Wikipedia is never a valid source
BTW the way the media was covering it,could be grounds for a mistrial
and also Wikipedia is never a valid source
BTW the way the media was covering it,could be grounds for a mistrial
Ghengis_John
[13] Hero
I suppose that's fair. Either way there's nothing any of us can do about it/ would do about it.
I'm not writing a history paper, I'm trying to find out a bit about the case without taking all morning. Which I ended up doing anyhow. In the process I learned everything on the page was a part of the court case and that CNN is awful and I cannot stand to read them. "The little girl thrown away like her precious life was worthless trash. No doubt she cried at the bitter betrayal, but if she did those tears long since lost... lost to us like teardrops in the rain." Or something along those lines.
No. Not really. Since the jury's insulated from the news anyhow. If you mean before the case began? Well they didn't seem to have a problem finding 12 people who'd let her go now did they?
