2009 NFL thread

Vick = Talented = Speed = Wildcat = Unstopable = Super Bowl.

You have got to be joking... how about you tone it down a bit? Do you want to be embarassed like last week again when NO handled the Eagles 48-22, after talking all that shit without any knowledge to back it up. Didn't that teach you a lesson about being a bit humble? URRR DURRRR EAGLES WINNERZ HERRR DURRR

Apparently not.
 
You have got to be joking... how about you tone it down a bit? Do you want to be embarassed like last week again when NO handled the Eagles 48-22, after talking all that shit without any knowledge to back it up. Didn't that teach you a lesson about being a bit humble? URRR DURRRR EAGLES WINNERZ HERRR DURRR

Apparently not.
No, I am not joking dipshit, big deal one lost, oh no the season is over for the Eagles... NOT. You realize that the Eagles only lost that game do to that stupid fumble by Hobbs right? Because of that fumble it turn the momentum around. From there it got fucked up. The Eagles is still much better team than the Saints. If McNabb/Vick was playing during the Saints game, yall would have lost. Regardless how good Drew Brees is, he is only one man. The Saints not going to be hot for long, watch and see, its going to be just like the last 2 years for them, DISAPPOINTMENT. They ain't going nowhere. Besides the Eagles always start slow, but after a big loss, they are fired up. So don't think because of one lost, the Saints are better than the Eagles. Trust me, the Eagles will go further than the Saints this season. You got to be stupid to think other whys. Besides stop being on Drew Brees' dick. I know he is good, but he not going to take the Saints to the Super bowl. Be realistic here. Eagles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saints.
 
When you lose by double digits, it's never the result of a single play, momentum or otherwise. Two weeks into the season, the Saints are playing MUCH better than the Eagles. Since it's early, that could change, but you have nothing to base your claim that the Eagles are that much better than the Saints, other than being from Philly and having previously admitted to having a small dick on the internet. (unrelated premise but worth noting)

Try this. The Giants are known to have a strong defense and running game, and are generally perceived by current football media experts to be the #1 team in the NFC East. While they've put up good numbers in the passing game, going against preseason concerns of a perceived weakness, their running game looked subpar against the Cowboys, as did their run defense, two points of pride from years past. Also, injuries to a young but talented secondary could be long term concerns, although they haven't proven to be against the Redskins or Cowboys. Looking long term, I have reason to believe these issues can be fixed due to a strong, disciplined approach by the coaching staff, and a series of weaker opponents over the next few weeks that will allow the Giants to work out some of the problems they've been having so far. This will also give Manning time to build chemistry with Steve Smith and Mario Manningham, who have played well through the first two games.

See what I did there? Probably not, but it's worth a shot.
 
Wall of txt, still doesn't get it.

Thank you Kowtow, this is an NFL discussion thread. God forbid you would back up anything you say, so it could lead to an ACTUAL discussion.

Don't just troll the thread with EAGLEZ RULZ and hope to get any decent response. It's clutter.

Next...

Vick = Talented = Speed = Wildcat = Unstopable = Super Bowl.

And I'm on Drew Brees' dick? Ok buddy.

You can send any response to me via PM so we don't have a pissing contest all over a decent thread.
 
Back
Top