MorsCodeStutter
[10] Knight
I wanted to know what the consensus was for 8wayrun about the new Two and a Half Men season starring Ashton Kutcher. Even people who don't really keep up with E-gossip, most of you would have some basic understanding of the controversy caused by Charlie Sheen's departure from the show. There's been a lot of nostalgic debate about how Ashton Kutcher has ruined the show and that it's really nothing anymore without the Charlie Harper character to which it was built around.
I personally think that the show is still as good as it was even without its true leading man. The writers put a lot of effort in keeping it alive and are doing a ballsy thing continuing it rather than giving it up just because of a minor set back. The Charlie Harper age was about a mysoginist and his immoral lifestyle, while the new Walden Schmidt age is about some hopeless romantic dork who just so happens to be a billionaire and a super hottie who still can't land true love--and so the show has definitely changed drastically, but why resist change? Can one version be objectively better than the other without having to consider too much into the fact that Charlie Harper seasons in quantity outweigh the Walden Schmidt's singular season as well as familiarity?
What are your thoughts?
Also, for those who never even liked the show to begin with...yeah don't bother. This thread ain't for you. This thread are for those who used to like it until Charlie Sheen left AND obviously for the people who have continued watching it ever since.
I personally think that the show is still as good as it was even without its true leading man. The writers put a lot of effort in keeping it alive and are doing a ballsy thing continuing it rather than giving it up just because of a minor set back. The Charlie Harper age was about a mysoginist and his immoral lifestyle, while the new Walden Schmidt age is about some hopeless romantic dork who just so happens to be a billionaire and a super hottie who still can't land true love--and so the show has definitely changed drastically, but why resist change? Can one version be objectively better than the other without having to consider too much into the fact that Charlie Harper seasons in quantity outweigh the Walden Schmidt's singular season as well as familiarity?
What are your thoughts?
Also, for those who never even liked the show to begin with...yeah don't bother. This thread ain't for you. This thread are for those who used to like it until Charlie Sheen left AND obviously for the people who have continued watching it ever since.