MntT77
[10] Knight
Not saying I disagree but you can present your argument much better. Not only that, but I think saying identifying someone as "biologicaly" or "born" sex allows for much less confusion than other ways of identifying people's sex.
Regardless, all I know is that, if I slept with a female who was born a male, I wouldn't want to know...
I do need to stop the occasional sarcastic lines that permeate a lot of my arguments, to be fair.
Not to mention that there's always the classification of hermaphrodite...I honestly don't see where the problem lies with referring to somene's biological sex...unless that person is screwed up.
There's no such thing as a human hermaphrodite - 'hermaphrodite' implies fully functioning male and female genitalia. I assume you mean 'intersex'.