DEV TEST

I mean, I just think that people are following a bandwagon and have little expierience.

Pressure. Damage. Ringouts.

...

Because she's da bess.

Everyone can damage well. She is pretty weak to step from my (limited) knowledge of her. The same thing for voldo happens when I don't know his lows due to his impopularity, and hers.

She's pretty gud.

but top? over Pyrrha? Patroklos? Patsuka? Cervy? I don't think so.

Well...Viola's pretty fukkin' bananas. It's pretty funny when you have to say, "Well, she has pretty bad matchups, but...."

I don't know, maybe it is because I may not have honestly fought one since the buff.

Well, there are really only a handful of players who can make a good player think, "Damn...that bitch is broke!"

Yeah, this game is actually really balanced.

You say that you have limited experience of her but that everyone else is following a bandwagon etc? You tryna be a hipster on here or something?

Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. Because of France or some other European country and the lack of trying, I feel like everyone just blindly believes that she is good. I myself do not have much experience but have seen her frame data and remember the few horizontals and "superness" or lack thereof of her.

I think you're right. Viola does have a shit ton of holes in her game. It's just that her damage, ringout potential, and her endgame (touch of death) can make up for a lot of that in a lot of situations.

I think she has the best comeback potential in the game, bar none...or however the saying goes.

"Lv 3 X-Factor Viola with full meter"