Hate Speech: PATCH NOTE APOCALYPSE

because U and I arent right next to each other on the keyboard right? It also doesnt sound like english is his first language.
 
What I am really criticizing is the concept of the game being imbalanced after a week from this patch, when everyone's idea of balance is subjective, and when there's no tier list.

There's some changes that I don't like, but this game isn't SC4 where half of the cast couldn't be used competitively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LP
@Malice

i found a lot of tier list based on the official SC5 guide.

Anyway, as i stated before: is a madness (no, SPARTA!!!!. XD) change ALL the chars, instead of change only the low tiers, is a very bad thing: IMO, the best way to balance a game is buffing lows, no nefering highs.

and i do not agree with you: now, this is like SC4, Maxi, Leixia, etc, can not be use anymore at competitive level due damage reduction, decreased moves' frames, etc. PLUS the buffs suffered by Viola (damage increased and almost undodgeable orb's setups) for example
 
You have to take that tier list in the SCV guide with a grain of salt because it was based on an unpatched version of the game and determined by people whose time with the game was limited. Tier lists need months if not years to develop.

But the game isn't unbalanced because one character got buffed and two characters got nerfed. What about the rest of the characters on the roster?
 
i was refering to all them even when i wrote only 3 of them. ^^U.

But, my point is if they nerf some characters (even a bit) but buff the rest of them instead of nerf/buff some of them, the only thing they will get is move the weight between characters instead of balancing them. That is was i were criticising. ^^U.
 
Back
Top